The integrity of competitive sports is deeply rooted in fairness, discipline, and an unwavering commitment to ethical conduct. Among the most pressing challenges that undermine these values is ‘doping’—the use of prohibited substances and methods by athletes to gain unfair advantage. Globally, governments and international sports bodies have been working in tandem to tackle this menace. In this context, Indian government took a significant step forward in 2025 by passing the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Act, amending the National Anti-Doping Act, 2022.
The anti-doping amendment bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on July 23, 2025 and passed by the Lok Sabha on August 11, 2025 and by the Rajya Sabha on August 12, 2025. It received the president’s assent on August 18, 2025 and became an act. The 2025 amendment is not just a technical correction to an existing statute. It represents a substantial restructuring of the anti-doping regime in India. Its passage signals India’s attempt to bring its legal and regulatory framework in line with the World Anti-Doping Code (WADC) and international best practices. It also addresses the operational shortcomings of the earlier legislation and introduces a clearer demarcation of powers, enhanced procedural standards and safeguards for athletes’ protection.
Background: The Need for Legislative Alignment
The National Anti-Doping Act 2022 was enacted to meet India’s obligations under the UNESCO’s International Convention against Doping in Sport, to which India is a signatory. The act established the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) as the primary body for implementing anti-doping rules and created the National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports to oversee its functioning.
However, evolving international standards, particularly those articulated by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), necessitated changes in India’s domestic legal regime. Moreover, concerns regarding political interference, lack of procedural clarity and insufficient autonomy of disciplinary mechanisms prompted the need for amendments. The 2025 bill was introduced to address these lacunae and enhance India’s credibility in the international sports arena.
Key Changes and Structural Enhancements
Centralisation of Appeals
One of the most significant changes introduced by the amendment pertains to the appellate structure governing doping violations. Under the 2022 act, the national board was responsible for constituting both the Disciplinary Panel and the Appeal panel, and further had the authority to frame regulations regarding the filing and hearing of appeals. The 2025 amendment removes this authority, vesting it in the central government which will prescribe rules regarding the composition, appointment, and procedures of the Appeal Panel.
This centralisation reflects a shift of power from autonomous regulatory bodies to the central executive. While this move is argued to streamline processes and ensure uniformity, it has also sparked concerns over governmental overreach and reduced institutional independence.
Operational Independence of NADA and its Functionaries
In order to meet WADA’s standards, the amendment reinforces the operational independence of the director general and functionaries of NADA. It explicitly states that NADA would operate independently of any
- national or international sports federation,
- Olympic or Paralympic committee,
- government department,
- any other agency involved in sports or anti-doping.
Previously, the national board had the power to direct or obtain information from the disciplinary and appeal panels. These powers have now been stripped from the board, ensuring that adjudicatory bodies function without undue influence.
Codification of Global Standards: Incorporating the WADC
The most crucial legal reform in the amendment is the formal incorporation of a new schedule to the principal act, added after section 34 to bring Article 2 of the WADC into Indian law. This article defines the categories of anti-doping rule violations. The inclusion of this schedule gives the code legal force within India, ensuring compliance with international standards.
Under the amendment, the central government further has the authority to update or modify this schedule. It, thereby, allows India to remain in sync with future evolutions of the code without needing a fresh legislative action.
Anti-Doping Rule Violations
Any one or more of the following circumstances, acts, or conduct shall constitute an anti-doping rule violation:
- Presence of a prohibited substance or its metabolites or markers in an athlete’s sample, unless such presence is exempted under section 5
- Use or attempted use by an athlete of any prohibited substance or any prohibited method, unless exempted under section 5
- Evading sample collection, or refusing or failing to submit to sample collection without compelling justification after notification by a duly authorised person
- Whereabouts failures by an athlete as specified in the code
- [‘Whereabouts failures’ is a violation that includes failure to provide accurate location details or being unavailable for random testing. With the new amendment, the term ‘whereabouts failure’ is no longer defined by the Indian act but instead, refers directly to its definition in the WADC.]
- Tampering or attempted tampering with any part of doping control by an athlete or other person
- Possession of any prohibited substance or any prohibited method by an athlete or athlete support personnel, unless exempted under section 5
- Trafficking or attempted trafficking in any prohibited substance or prohibited method by an athlete or other person
- Administration or attempted administration by an athlete or other person to any athlete in-competition of any prohibited substance or method, or administration or attempted administration out-of-competition of any prohibited substance or method prohibited out-of-competition
- Assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, conspiring, covering up, or any other type of intentional complicity or attempted complicity involving an Anti-Doping Rule Violation, attempted violation, or violation of the prohibition against participation during ineligibility or provisional suspension
- Prohibited association by an athlete or other person, as the Agency may specify by regulations
- Acts to discourage or retaliate against reporting to authorities
These provisions codify WADA standards and clearly enumerate prohibited acts, ensuring clarity and enforceability in the Indian anti-doping framework.
Jurisdiction and Access to International Appeals: Clarifying CAS Access
Prior to the 2025 amendment, any person could file an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Switzerland against decisions of the Appeal Panel. This open-ended provision lacked procedural rigour and did not align with international norms.
The amendment restricts the ability to file appeals before CAS to a specific list of authorised entities, including—WADA, International Olympic Committee (IOC), International Paralympic Committee (IPC), and Relevant international sports federations.
In cases involving international-level athletes or events, the right to directly appeal a Disciplinary Panel’s decision to CAS is granted to the affected athlete, NADA, the relevant international federation, WADA, and IOC or IPC (where Olympic or Paralympic eligibility may be affected).
Additionally, the amendment allows WADA to appeal directly to CAS against a final decision by NADA, even if no other party has initiated an appeal in India. This provision aligns India’s legal mechanisms with Article 13 of the WADC, which grants WADA this prerogative.
Enhancing the Review Process for Adverse Analytical Findings
The amendment adds critical safeguards for athletes whose test results return adverse findings. It mandates that during the review process NADA must examine whether
- the testing or investigation procedures complied with WADA’s international standards,
- any departure from those standards may have led to an inaccurate result.
This procedural reform introduces a vital layer of protection for athletes, ensuring that penalties are not imposed on the basis of flawed testing methods or laboratory errors. It institutionalises a fairness check within the enforcement process, balancing stringent anti-doping enforcement with due process.
Mandatory WADA Accreditation for Testing Laboratories
In the 2022 act, laboratories conducting dope testing in India could choose to obtain accreditation from WADA. The 2025 amendment makes such accreditation mandatory, thereby aligning domestic testing procedures with globally accepted standards.
This change would help enhance the credibility of test results, improve international acceptance, and minimise disputes over testing protocols. Moreover, it ensures that athletes are subjected to uniform procedures, irrespective of the laboratory where the test is conducted.
Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE)
A significant enhancement in the amended bill is the revision of provisions related to therapeutic use exemption (TUE). These exemptions permit athletes to use certain prohibited substances for genuine medical reasons.
Under the new framework, when a doping test is positive, NADA is required to
- check whether a valid TUE exists before disciplinary action,
- investigate possible laboratory or testing errors, and
- assess whether prohibited substances were ingested via permitted methods.
Only after these checks are completed could disciplinary actions proceed. This addition ensures that athletes with legitimate medical needs are not unfairly penalised and that their rights are preserved within the legal system.
Government’s Rationale and Parliamentary Deliberations
The Union Minister for Youth Affairs and Sports, Mansukh Mandaviya, while introducing the amendment, clarified that the act is intended to align India’s anti-doping laws with evolving international frameworks. He emphasised that previous legal entanglements—what he called ‘legal paralysis’—negatively impacted athletes’ performances, and that the new act would dismantle these barriers. He further stated that the objective is to streamline the regulatory ecosystem, ensuring compliance with WADA standards and building confidence in India’s sporting governance.
The minister underlined that this legislation is a cornerstone of the government’s broader vision to take India from ‘ground to glory’ in the global sporting arena. The focus, he noted, is not only on stringent enforcement but also on building a robust sporting eco system under initiatives like ‘Fit India Khelo India’.
However, concerns were raised during the parliamentary debates. Critics pointed to the act’s provisions that shift authority from independent bodies to the central government, cautioning that this may attract further scrutiny from WADA which had earlier expressed reservations about political interference in India’s anti-doping operations. Some opposition leaders accused the government of bulldozing the legislation, warning against extreme centralisation and erosion of independent oversight and called for the Bill to be referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee, citing the need for broader consensus and stakeholder consultation.
Way forward
The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) act, 2025 is a comprehensive effort to modernise India’s anti-doping framework in line with international expectations. By codifying the WADC, ensuring operational independence of NADA, tightening procedural norms, and limiting arbitrariness in appellate mechanisms, the legislation strengthens the legal scaffolding required for clean and fair sports.
However, the shift in regulatory powers towards the executive branch raises important questions about institutional autonomy and checks and balances. While the intent behind the reforms is laudable, their effectiveness would ultimately depend on transparent implementation, judicial oversight, and continued dialogue with international bodies like WADA.
As India positions itself as a serious contender on the global sports stage, the legal and ethical foundation laid by this amendment could play a defining role in shaping the country’s sporting future, one where excellence is achieved not by cutting corners, but by upholding the spirit of fair play.
© Spectrum Books Pvt Ltd.
